DNS vs Dynamic DNS vs Anycast DNS
Learn the differences between standard, dynamic, and Anycast DNS, and how Medianova implements Anycast routing for high availability and low-latency resolution.
While all three terms involve domain name resolution, they operate at distinct layers of the DNS ecosystem. Understanding these differences is essential for designing resilient, globally distributed, and latency-optimized architectures. Within Medianova’s DNS platform, standard authoritative DNS manages domain-to-resource mappings, while Anycast DNS provides geographically distributed resolution for speed and redundancy.
Standard (Authoritative) DNS
Purpose: Maps domain names to static resource records such as IP addresses, MX endpoints, or CNAME targets. Authoritative DNS acts as the single source of truth for each zone.
Characteristics:
Deterministic lookups based on record type (A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, etc.)
Configurable TTL determines caching duration
Managed through the Medianova Control Panel or API
Suitable for stable, production environments
Medianova Context: Medianova provides authoritative DNS zones for each CDN Resource and Redirect domain, ensuring consistent propagation and versioned configuration control.
Dynamic DNS (DDNS)
Purpose: Automatically updates DNS records when an endpoint’s IP address changes — common in residential or small-scale deployments.
Characteristics:
Client agents detect IP changes and push updates to DNS servers
Records use low TTL values for rapid refresh
Suitable for IoT, VPNs, or home networks
Medianova Context: Dynamic DNS is not typically required in Medianova’s enterprise CDN infrastructure, where IPs are stable and traffic routing is handled at the CDN and Anycast layers. However, it may be useful for internal monitoring or temporary staging zones that rely on dynamic endpoints.
Limitations:
Not designed for production CDN workloads
No guarantee of global propagation consistency
Dependent on third-party DDNS clients
Anycast DNS
Purpose: Anycast is a network-level routing strategy used to distribute DNS resolution across multiple geographic nodes that share the same IP address. BGP automatically directs the resolver to the node with the most optimal network path, not necessarily the physically nearest one.
Characteristics:
Same IP address announced from multiple data centers
Network-proximity routing for lower lookup latency
Seamless failover during regional or network-level outages
High resilience against volumetric attacks (DDoS mitigation)
Medianova Context:
Medianova operates Anycast authoritative nameservers (ns1.medianova.com, ns2.medianova.com) to ensure:
Low-latency query responses across global regions
Automatic route failover in case of node or path degradation
Consistent propagation of DNS zone updates
Anycast is the backbone of Medianova DNS reliability, enabling faster resolution for CDN, Redirect, and CNAME requests.
Comparison Summary
Purpose
Map static domains to records
Auto-update changing endpoints
Distribute resolver traffic globally
Update Method
Manual or API
Client-triggered
Network-level (BGP)
Primary Use Case
Websites, CDN resources, mail servers
Remote access, IoT
Global, low-latency DNS
Caching Policy
TTL-based
Very low TTL
TTL-based with regional caching
Reliability Scope
Depends on single authoritative zone
Limited to single endpoint
Multi-node redundancy
Medianova Implementation
Core DNS management system
Optional for dynamic staging
Active Anycast DNS backbone
When to Use Each Type
Stable production domains
Authoritative DNS
CDN Resource zone management
Changing IP endpoints
Dynamic DNS
External DDNS (if required)
Global high-availability resolution
Anycast DNS
Medianova Anycast Nameservers
Last updated
Was this helpful?